Categories
- AP patterning (13)
- Blog (1)
- Chromatin (88)
- Conference Notes (72)
- Fly Work (54)
- General STORM (25)
- Genomics (134)
- Journal Club (22)
- Lab Meeting (66)
- Microscopy (79)
- Notes (1)
- probe and plasmid building (58)
- Project Meeting (3)
- Protocols (13)
- Research Planning (74)
- Seminars (21)
- Shadow Enhancers (59)
- snail patterning (40)
- Software Development (5)
- Summaries (1,412)
- Teaching (9)
- Transcription Modeling (40)
- Uncategorized (10)
- Web development (19)
Links
Tags
analysis cell culture cell labeling chromatin cloning coding communication confocal data analysis embryo collection embryo labeling figures fly work genomics hb image analysis image processing images in situs Library2 literature making antibodies matlab-storm meetings modeling MP12 mRNA counting Ph planning presentation probe making project 2 project2 result results sectioning section staining shadow enhancers sna snail staining STORM STORM analysis troubleshooting writing-
GitHub Projects
Daily Archives: December 17, 2010
Protected: shadow enhancer modeling
There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.
Posted in Shadow Enhancers, Transcription Modeling
Enter your password to view comments.
Protected: hunchback modeling
There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.
Posted in AP patterning
Enter your password to view comments.
Notebook updates
added MathJax plugin for imbedded latex. Doesn’t seem to work. Switched to wp-latex. This works: $latex e^{\i \pi} + 1 = 0$ Also install WP-table Reloaded for table editing Migrate Fly database to online hosting
Posted in Web development
Comments Off on Notebook updates
Fly Work
Give Perry vnd[D38] and brk[M68] gene deletion stocks. Flip collection cages for MP11/CyO, MP3/CyO, sna[18]/CyO; MP10s, 2:30 P Cross hkb::fog stock 1 x fog null virgins (10 vials) at 22C Organize stocks for hb rescue to set up crosses over … Continue reading
Posted in Fly Work
Leave a comment
Markov Paper
Final edits: conversation of ‘IR/ER model’ to ‘IR/ER scheme’, (the models are ‘toy’ and ‘complex’, for which we compare two regulatory ‘schemes’). Upload Paper, Response to Reviewers, 6 Figures, Supplemental Text, 6 Supplemental Figures, Code with readme linking to webpage … Continue reading
Posted in Transcription Modeling
Leave a comment