Category Archives: AP patterning

hunchback and bcd antibody testing

Posted on January 12, 2012 by admin

some quick checks looking at dynamically refinement of hb gradient. Hb (green) and Bcd (red) double stained (early cc13?)         zoom , showing subnuclear localization patterns.           showing very gradual hb transition   … Continue reading →

Posted in AP patterning, Microscopy | Tagged , , | Comments Off on hunchback and bcd antibody testing

Protected: MP09 intensity sensitivity

Posted on June 23, 2011 by admin

There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.

Posted in AP patterning, Microscopy, Shadow Enhancers | Tagged , , , , | Enter your password to view comments.

Protected: bcd 1x v 6x cont

Posted on June 21, 2011 by admin

There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.

Posted in AP patterning | Tagged , , , | Enter your password to view comments.

Protected: Analysis of 5-22 data b

Posted on June 16, 2011 by admin

There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.

Posted in AP patterning, Shadow Enhancers, Transcription Modeling | Tagged , , , , | Enter your password to view comments.

Protected: new hb analysis

Posted on March 25, 2011 by admin

There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.

Posted in AP patterning, Microscopy, Shadow Enhancers | Enter your password to view comments.

hb-gradient analysis

Posted on February 2, 2011 by admin

Analyzing hb-gradient: anlz_hb_gradient_data.m   (committed to Git). Circular field lines not appropriate (obviously).  Need to compute planes of separation instead. May be better to ensure original data has appropriate left-right planar orientation.  This will not only make segmentation easier, but … Continue reading →

Posted in AP patterning, Microscopy | Comments Off on hb-gradient analysis

Protected: hb enhancer modeling

Posted on January 7, 2011 by admin

There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.

Posted in AP patterning, Shadow Enhancers, Transcription Modeling | Enter your password to view comments.

Comparison to Gregor data

Posted on January 6, 2011 by admin

To count all 770 molecules in the nucleus according to Thomas data (D =1, c=4.8, a=.003) would take 890 minutes (and give 3.6% diffusion error). naturally 100 molecules gives a std/mean 0f 10%, and is thus the natural threshold for … Continue reading →

Posted in AP patterning, Transcription Modeling | Leave a comment

Protected: Comparison to hb data

Posted on January 6, 2011 by admin

There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.

Posted in AP patterning, Transcription Modeling | Enter your password to view comments.

Protected: hunchback modeling

Posted on December 17, 2010 by admin

There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.

Posted in AP patterning | Enter your password to view comments.