Fly Meeting, Thur 3/5/14
Thursday Morning Platform Presentations
Yohnns Bellaiche: cell division in morphogenesis
- Intro: beautiful movie of zebrafish morphogenesis
- system: Pupal morphogenesis
- Goal: multiscale imaging –
- 900 63x images (cellular resolution of whole tissue).
- all 900 images every 5 min
- Can segment and color-code cells, for example by size.
- 50,000 cells, most junctions formed by cell division, formation of a single large interface.
- important for polarity maintenance, lies behind clonal patch.
- in cell culture, get actin ring that contracts to a point (not like long interphase in epithelial tissue)
- Neighboring cell forces are necessary to get a long interface (oblate cells, get constriction to a point contact).
- Two membranes invaginate to form long pairs of branches,
- move over, myosin not must localized at interphase of cell, but also expressed inside cell edge of neighboring cell.
- this is a response to the mechanical stress
- this myosin helps hold the two membranes together so it invaginates as a narrow pennisula and not a big v (can laser ablate just the myosin in this cell and they spring apart into a v, but then recover).
- MyoII in neighboring cell is therefore required.
- Does membrane of neighboring cell get inserted between dividing cells?
- Yes it does ingress!
- but it retracts / degrades in the end.
- F actin is recruited to the interface at the time of retraction of inserted membrane.
- Prevent F-actin function, it is the neighboring cells membrane that remains and two cells separate.
- Actin flow inside dividing cells drives withdrawl of the membrane
- Quantifying cell behaviors: size/shape change, cell rearrangememnt, cell division, and delamination. Plot spatial frequency of these events throughout the tissue.
- estimate junction stress from lattice image.
Genetic Conflicts During Meiosis Drive Innovation in Centromeric Proteins — Harmit Malik,
- Adapting to a changing / co-evolving environment
- genetic conflicts within the same genome
- conflict between ‘selfish centromeres’ and chromosome segregation?
- Male meiosis in plants and animals
- one homolog can poison the other sibling chromosome sperm
- highly adventageous to the one chromosome that will win
- disadventageous as fertility drops 50%
- female meiosis (in plants and animals), only 1 cell wins the preferred position
- if one chromosome can orient itself better (faster microtubule recruitment) can win more often. Selfish centromeres can increase transmission rate past 50%
- examples: Robertsonian chromosomes (fusions of centromere-at-end chromosomes) These are normal, our chr2 is a Robersonian fusion still separate in great apes.
- over-recruitment of centromeric proteins.
- in male meiosis suffer fertility (male meiosis ‘likes symmetry’) (.1% of humans are Robertsonian)
- 60:40 segregation will sweep Drosophila in 10,000 years
- In Drosophila centromere boundaries / strengths are set up epigenetically
- heterochromatin protein over expression can encroach on centromere and vice versa.
- selfish centromeres try to get larger, penality paid in the males. intense evolution at centromere and centromeric proteins.
- Non-canonical nuclesome (H3 replaced by CENP-A) in centromeres
- swap Cid (fly chromosome centromeres) between simulans and yakuba, viability 95% (in both male and female F1) (viability not fertility?)
- predict reconstruction of ancesetoral Cid, no effect on F1 female viability but strong effect still in male.
- HP1b non-essential, but its daughter gene Umbrea does localize to centromere and is essential for normal cell division. Knockdown results in massive aneploidy.
- a constant turnover of essential centromeric proteins.
- C elegans ar holocentric (whole chromosome is a centromere, rather than concentrated at point on chromosome).
- Lepidoptera, Hemioptera, all lose CenH3 and have holocentric chromosome division.
- loss is specific and multiple times in the insect lineages.
- old genes can become dispensable and young genes essential.
Angela Stathopolous: mesoderm cell migration
Intro
- FGF ligands pyramus and Ths expressed in different tissues
- FGF signaling required for proper mesoderm spreading (should form a nice internal monolayer)
- cells don’t cross the midline
- in htl mutants, upper domain cells do not exhibit directed movement and cross back and forth across the midline.
- Role of leader cells — compotent to move in mutants or wt. FGF not so much chemo-attractant. More important in ensuring symmetric collapse of the mesoderm.
- Conducted genetic screen (311 UAS lines), found 10 genes that affect mesoderm spreading.
Screen results:
- Trol (HSPG) is required for furrow collapse
- Sdc is required for intercalation and differentiation.
- ectopic expression of pyr or ths in mesoderm leads to lumpy pile up of cells in mesoderm.
- E-cadherin (normally down regulated in mesoderm). knockdown or overexpress lose monolayer of mesoderm.
- E cad localization changed in htl mutants.
- propose snail is effected by FGF. sna up-regulated in absense of FGF, down-regulated by FGF.
- propose FGF regulates spreading by controlling adhesion state through E-cad regulation.
CVM cell migration
- long range 6 hour migration
- cells express heartless. Follow a track of cells expressing Pyr and Ths.
- In FGF mutants cells still migrate, but they intermix
- why do leader cells move faster? posterior cells hardly move…
- FACs to isolate CVM cells and RNAseq
- find enrichment in lipid synthesis in CVMs.
- sphingolipids regulate germ cell migration. watch comigration of germ cells and CVMs.
- lipid mutants show defects in migration.
Stas Shvartsman
Intro
- ERK signaling – used multiple times in development
- excessive ERK activation lead to many varieites of prevelant developmental abnormaliites.
- localized RTK responds to transient pulses of ERK throughout development in many tissues.
- ERK activates ind
- will describe mathematical model that captures behavior semi-quantitatively and makes several clear predictions.
- ### reconstructing dynamics
- don’t have a live sensor
- compare stills to database of live imaging movies to match morphology. record movies in the same vertically orienting PDMS device.
- linear regression model matches features of images (5 dimension 5 component PCA mapping). Accuracy is better than 3 min (presumably matching embryo to embryo)
- Question: does the 3 min accuracy come from intrinsic embryo to embryo variation, or uncertainty in the morphogenic mapping
Ind activation
- receptor uniformly expressed, activated by Vn and Spitz. Vein is dispensible, Spitz (regulated by rho) is essential – necessary and sufficient. Don’t see any consequence from removing vn.
- ERK signal grows as the t^3 over time.
- Pathway: Zld activated EGFR, Star and Spitz. Ligand grows linearly in time, receptor grows linear in time, integrated this rate over time, expect cubic growth.
- Ind is expressed when ERK crosses a basic threshold.
- delay induction in csw mutant, lower levels of ERK, takes longer to cross threshold, still turn on Ind.
- How is ind responding to ERK? – regulated by Cic. ERK relieves Cic repression.
- ERK first inactivates Cic, which is then exported and degraded.
implications
- upstream factors of ERK frequently mutated in developmental defects and cancer
- propose that cancer assoicated mutations will be lethal in development
- introduce mutations from human abnormalities into fly embryo.
- change ERK pulse. Both developmental abnormality and cancer mutations cause strong lethal phenotypes in fly.
- also developing computational tools.
- reduce Cic, also (reduce) ERK signalling
Maria Dominguez: Addressing complixity in Notch signaling and cancer
Intro
- finding out the unknown unknowns of cancer
- ‘peto’s paradox’: no relationship over species between cancer and organism. Mice have higher incidence of cancer than humans, whales have less.
- No / almost never cancer in naked mole rate. — lower metabolism, less Reactive Oxygen species
- Tumor cell communication is important.
- Nutrition is relevant.
- Size regulation / growth regulation / when to stop is relevant. — best understood in flies (?) Notch povides growth directions
Notch-Pten/Akt in cancer
- Delta upregulation minor overgrowth
- Delta + ATK upreguatlion dramatic cancer (clearly visible in eye tumor)
- ATK is downstream of INLS/IGF/RTK/PI3K and upstream of dTOR
- PTEN links NICD to Atk1
- Screened sigma-aldrich library of pharmological active compounds looking for effectors of (PTEN?)
- 150 flies screened per each 1000 compounds, ID 62 compounds that attenuate and 58 that enhance eye tumors
- 23 of the 62 reduce growth in human cultured tumor cells. ~6 of these don’t affect growth of non-tumor cells. (what happened to PTEN / NOTCH?)
- chose drug that has the strongest effect at lowest concentration.
- find atp syn Beta gene
- Warburg hypothesis: mitochondria dysfunction causes tumors.
- Test: overexpress Delta and knockdwon atp synthase beta -> tumors
- mitochondria dysfunction facilitates tumor growth through Delta/Notch signaling (these dysfunctional cells should die.
- Delta+ and PTEN-kd flies have elevated levels of ROS (using ROS Gstd1-GFP sensor).
- chemotherapy elevates ROS to kill tumor cells.
Juergen Knoblich, (IMBA) Stem Cells
Intro
- stem cell number rapidly decreases during development.
- Timely loss of stem cells is important to avoid child tumors
- Drosophila neuroblasts (neural stem cells). Responsible for generating all the neurons and glia in adult brain.
- Type I: dived assymetrically, differentiatin cell divides into 2 neurons. (mice)
- Type 2 proliferative cell is generated from first asymetric division and then divide and differentiate. (flies and humans)
Drosophila neuroblasts
- Drosophila pupal NBs shrink before disappearing (in diameter before differentiating),
- consequence of metabolic limits of non-eating pupae?
- Follow neuroblast division in culture to test.
- due larval and pupal NBs culture differently? Pupal neuroblasts become smaller with cell divsion, larval ones do not. Not related to division rate.
- known growth pathways do not appear to be involved. — Genetic screen:
- express luciferase in neuroblasts.
- Find 300 RNAi lines that affect behavior, none appear to be off-targets
- 8 of these map to Mediator complex.
- knockdown mediator components (Med27, Med10), get cell-type specific effect: more neuroblasts, less shrinkage and death. Increased diameter of neuroblasts.
- Question: Does it matter which subunits of mediator you knockdown? (Is mediator functioning in a modular way?)’
- Mediator is required for Ecdysone response (major hormone that triggers instar changes, spikes in pupation.
- Mediator regulates metabolism.
- NB cell cycle exit requires alpha-KGDHC (knock this down and they don’t exit / differentiate). (Gate keeper of Krebs Cycle, catalyzes the first irreversible step of Krebs. Generates NADH for respitory chain.
- Mediator is required for upregulation of oxidative phosphorylation regulation.
- Proliferative tissues (staying same size) don’t do Krebs, rely on anaerobic metabolism.
- Metabolism change effects change in cell fate (rather than v.v.)
Thursday Evening Session: Organogenesis and gametogenesis
Weischaus lab Nucleolus formation
- rRNA synthesis starts by cc11. Nucleolus doesn’t form until cc13.
- phase separation model
- RNA PolI and fibriliarin form in the absence of rDNA (but are much weaker).
- rDNA is a nucleation site for fibrilian and PolI. Sites are less stable without it.
- What explains the difference in intensity? If it is just a seeding effect, one might expect it is just time.
Yiqin Ma (Buttitta Lab, U Michigan): Examining chromatin structure in G0
- Multiple types of G0: Reversible-quiescence, terminal differentiation, and senescence.
- will study terminal differention G0 in fly wing (naturally synchronized)
- exit cell cycle for last time to G0 24 hrs after pupal formation.
- Flexible G0 phase 24 hrs to 36 hr (can still exit). Thereafter robust G0.
- PcG /PRC2 and H3K9 methyltransferases up regulated on G0 exit
- heterochromatin histones and proteins are disrupted (based on immune staining)
- heterochromatin modifications are tightly associated with cell cycling status.
- K27me3 and HP1 not required for cell cycle exit.
- screen for other regulators,
the chromatin modifier trithorax regulates systemic signaling during imaginal disk regeneration
- use UAS GAL4 to drive reaper under TS-Ga80
- HS induce ablation (vero 90% of wing pouch). Use wing size to quanitfy amount of regeneration.
- Tune wildtype response to have 50% regeneration
- Find that Trithorax dominant increases regeneration and Trx mutant decreases.
- trx mutants regenerate half as much as wildtypes.
- trx hets still form regenerating blastemea — same amount of tissue is regenerating as in wildtype.
- tissue is not dying
- regenerating animals delay pupariation (depndent of insulin like peoptide 8 and retinoid signaling). Trx hets delay for less long.
- rescue pupation delay using UAS dilp8 — regenerate more wing.
- dlip8 is regulated by JNK signaling.
How is growth coordinated to maintain isometry (proper size and proportion)
- growth rate of eye reduced when wing disk is damaged and has to regrow.
- damaged imaginal tissues release dilp8 to coordinate growth.
- NOS overexpression also reduces growth rate of disks.
- experiment: irraiate larva, shield eyes with lead tape.
- NOS is necessary for growth delay in eye (remove NOS lose delay)
- NOS is not required for developmental delay but is a mediator of dilp8
- propose NOS is inhibitory on growth during feeding and activating afterwards.
This entry was posted in
Conference Notes. Bookmark the
permalink.