Q-bio sat afternoon 08/13/11

Alexander Hoffmann, University of California, San Diego, Parsimonious Gene Regulatory Network modeling reveals mRNA half-life control of the pathogen-responsive transcriptome

  • innate immune response info processing
  • decompose into modules.
  • combinatorial code encoded by signal pathway, decoded by TFs combos on promoters.
  • signaling dynamics are relevant to behavior.
  • previous work on encoding the temporal code. How is that read out?
  • GRNs from omits TF profiling, histones, TF binding.
  • Problems: expression of TF neq activity, binding which gene?
  • Activate indiv pathways, id coregulated genes.
  • Gene clusters contain distinct groups of GO terms
  • 1kb upstream search for TF binding sites.
  • some genes nascent tx not match total mRNA. LPS required to repress mRNA degredation.

Bernie Daigle, Jr., University of California, Santa Barbara, Accelerated Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Stochastic Biochemical Systems

  • estimate kinetic parameters in stochastic system.
  • bistable genetic switch cross repression noisy switching.
  • With exact parameters can sample with Gillespie.
  • what if you have a trajectory but not kinetics. Max likelihood inference.
  • Effect of discrete sampling
  • method require simulating data from current guess set f pars. Bad guesses are intractable to get data. Compare instead to set of sim data that are closest to data.
  • try to hit all data ‘harder’ the more data you have.

My talk.  Discuss with Ido Golding’s students. (Baylor).  Others

Vittorio Cristini, University of New Mexico, Tumor Modeling

  • Cancer from a theoretical engineer / applied mathematician
  • war on cancer has been very unsuccessful from a statistical point of view.
  • Molecular model, cell model (agent based approach) tissue model (how big is the tumor?)  Looking for emergent behavior.
  • Intro to mathematical pathology: map patient measurements into estimations relevant to clinical planning
  • Nutrient diffusion is the primary limiting factor to the growth of in-situ tumors.
  • Tumors reach stationary growth states very quickly — propose as reason why mammory screening on 3 month intervals show low detection can grow quickly — isn’t that better identified by clinical study with denser sampling?
  • proliferated index and apoptotic index can be directly measured from histology data (no fit).
  • Model projects tumor size/region that should be removed by dissection: how far to tumorigenic cells expend past calcified region (if left can lead to second tumor formation).
  • Patient specific approach to predicting tumor growth.
  • mammogram prediction and actual tumor size over-predicts or under-predicts by factors of 3.
  • histological grade (PI) is also a poor predictor — proliferative index and apoptotic index both increase with grade.
  • what are your other parameters — growth and death rate can get from histology, 3d simulation of cell growth/spreading and migration.
  • L/A is a much better predictor (growth / apoptosis).
Michael Deem, Rice University, Heterogeneous Diversity of Spacers within CRISPR
  • capture of viral DNA into crisper locus rare event in lysis.  Expression of spacers crRNAs silence phage RNA to provide immunity.
  • why more diversity of spacer elements near beginning than end of sequence?  (recent spacers more variable than historic spacers).
  • model: limit system to 2 spacers total. bacteria and viruses grow.  infinite population.
  • more positive fitness gain from dominant viral population.  First spacer is random, second spacer gets driven much more strongly to be equal to the dominant phage genotype.
  • what about selection back on phage? and phage mutation?   Add these, use literature claim: single basepair mutation allows phage to escape detection.
  • random deletion after 30 are in, probability scales linearly with distance.
  • simulation, diversity still increases monotonically with distance from leader.

Qiong Yang, Stanford University, Switch-like negative feedback promotes clock-like mitotic oscillation

  • Ferrell Lab
  • Early cell divisions in Xenapous: no check-point — free running.
  • Divisions still synchronous / coordinated
  • biochemical clock Cdk1 cyclin B1 form bistable switch.
  • Cdk1 activates APC which down regulates cycB1 (complex) — makes oscillator out of bistable system.
  • Reduced model cdk1-cycB call CC.  CC activates self, activates A, A represses C.  simple clock architecture.
  • CDK1 nullcline is cubic/like curve (experimentally measured) in response to APC.
  • sigmoidal response for nullcline of A as fxn of CDk1 required for limit cycle.
  • more ultrasenstive larger oscillatory region.
  • How about period and amplitude stability?  Period more stable at high hill coefficient.
  • How are you getting time in minutes in your model?  — best guess.  qualitative behaviors hold.
  • probe in cell extract adding protein components back in while inhibiting different parts of the pathway.  estimate hill coefficient of ~37 from data.
  • role of noise in circuit? Effects of feedback delay
  • Understanding spontaneous polarization in budding yeast
  • existing model: stocahstic activation of Cdc42p + positive feedback builds cluster.
  • what stops cluster when the un-clustered state is desired?
  • what limits the spread of a cluster (not spread whole membrane).  why only 1?
  • minimal model: membrane bound diffuse slowly, free diffuse fast.
  • loss of clustering for large N.  Repression of clustering for small N.  Emergence of individual cluster for intermideate N.  Substrate sequestration Turing instability.
  • small n case just like viral spread low density arrival of new components not greater than leaving rate of existing ones, even if you artificially build up a small cluster.
  • Intermediate N: clans either drift together and become fused.  all clans go extinct as t–> infinity (but new ones seed.  Meanwhile non-dominant ones much more likely to die).
Wan-Chen Lin, University of California, Berkeley, Spatial organization in cell membranes
  • Groves lab.  immunological synapse
  • T cell receptor and cSMAC in center.  ICAM-1 larger receptors, outer ring of synapse.
  • measure rate of radial movement of clusters.
  • these supported lipid membrane talks all look the same to me: receptors bind and cluster.  They don’t move past barriers.  clustering effects signalling.
  • myosin is important for signalling.  Where does this fit in? –required for proper clustering / bulls-eye synapse appearance.
  • dissect probability of activation as a function of number of receptors in cluster.  Need at least 4 peptides to activate T-cell. (yeah that’s a nice measurement).
  • use stochastic fluctuation analysis to estimate number of components.
  • PALM fixed pSMAC junction (resolution 45 nm)
  • larger clusters experience larger force more quickly moved to center.
Closing Banquet Talk, Peter Sorger, Harvard Medical School, Measuring and Modeling Cell Decision Processes

This entry was posted in Conference Notes. Bookmark the permalink.