Wednesday 05/22/13

10:20 A – 7:15 P, 8:30 P – 1:45 A

cell staining

  • remove samples from 40C, place in RT 2x SSCT for first rinse out.
  • check staining of control slide on STORM2 TIRF- no staining except in dead cells (should compare to unstained cells)
  • check staining of B secondary mediated stain on STORM2 – no staining except in dead cells (should compare to unstained cells)

reasons for failure?

  • probes no good / positive control gone bad?
  • issue with protocol execution?
  • too much NaBrH4 ?
  • dead cells suck out too much probe?
  • too little secondary?
  • try resuspending aliquot of orig probe in hybe buffer. measure conc on nanodrop.
  • checked unlabeled cells — yes dead cells are brighter, but nothing compared to labeled cells — so the dead cells do seem to eat probe.

Troubleshooting cell staining

  • EtOH precipitating Cy5-short secondary. Resuspend in hybe buffer and try at higher concentration for hybes
  1. try BX-C primary + secondary labeled (recent stock from Brian).
  2. try En1 at high conc. (Previously successful on embryos: 8 uL en probe in 40 uL dilution buffer, used 30 uL on coverglass)
  3. try AATAT with short P1 tail (100 nmol in 100 uL) and Cy5-short secondary
  4. try AATAT with long P2 tail (30 nmol in 30 uL) + new S2-Cy5 secondary (arrived today)
  5. try AATAT direct label as positive control
  6. negative control

Concentrations

  • AATAT with short P1 tail (100 nmol in 100 uL) = 1000 pmol per uL. dilute 1:20 in hybe = 50 pmol. use 1 uL of this in 30 uL reaction. (according to nanodrop was only ~2000 ng/uL 137 ng/uL)
  • try AATAT with long P2 tail (30 nmol in 30 uL) dilute 1:20 in hybe = 50 pmol. use 1 uL of this in 30 uL reaction.
  • reconcentrated short secondary 1: 334 ng/uL = 33 pmol /uL. use 1.7 uL in 30 uL reaction
  • S2-Cy5 ~3000 ng/uL = 284 pmol/uL

Probe labeling

  • resuspend probe at 100 nmol/100 uL at ethanol precipitate 15 uL (~15 nmol), keep dry.

Brian and Fred’s ‘3D’ Fish protocol:

  1. (Plate cells on polylysine coated coverslips)
  2. (allow cells ~1hr to attach)
  3. (Fix cells 10′ in 5% PFA)
  4. (wash out PFA in PBT)
  5. Incubate for 10’ in 1X PBS + 0.5% v/v Triton X-100 at RT
  6. Incubate for 2’ in 1X PBS at RT
  7. Incubate for 30’ in 1X PBS + 20% v/v glycerol
  8. Immerse the slide in liquid nitrogen using forceps and allow to freeze completely (~15
    seconds)
  9. Allow the slide to thaw face-up on a paper towel
  10. Repeat steps 8 and 9 two additional times
  11. Incubate for 1’ in 1X PBS at RT
  12. Incubate for 5’ in 1X PBS at RT
  13. Incubate for 5’ in 1X PBS at RT
  14. Incubate for 5’ in 0.1 M HCl at RT (425 uL of 36% HCl in 50 mL = .1 M)
  15. Incubate for 1’ in 2X SSC at RT
  16. Incubate for 1’ in 2X SSC at RT
  17. Incubate for 1’ in 2X SSC at RT
  18. Incubate for 35’ in 2X SSC + 50% v/v formamide at RT
  19. Tap slides dry on a paper towel (never allowing the face of the slide containing the cells
    to come into contact with the paper towel)
  20. Create a hybridization cocktail consisting of 12.5 μl of 2X hyb. mix (4X SSCT + 20% w/v
    dextran sulfate), 12.5 μl of formamide, and 20-40 pmole of each Oligopaints probe set
    per slide.
  21. Add the hybridization cocktail (typically 26-28 μl after adding the probe sets) to a 22×22
    cm coverslip, invert the slide onto the coverslip, and seal with rubber cement
  22. Allow the rubber cement to dry for 5’ at RT
  23. Denature the slides for 3’ at 78°C on a water-immersed heat block
  24. Hybridize overnight at 42°C in a humidified chamber
  25. The next day, remove the coverslip and wash for 15’ in 2X SSCT (2X SSC + 0.1% v/v
    Tween 20) at 60°C
  26. Incubate in 2X SSCT for 10’ at RT
  27. Incubate in 0.2X SSC for 10’ at RT

Seminar

  • Prof Hans Blom presentation (Royal Inst. Tech in Sweden)

Intro

  • single protein detection (~1970?)
  • single fluor detect Los Alamos (1990)

receptor clusters

  • sodium channels cluster in neurons
  • dopamine and NKA receptors co-cluster in head of neural spine but not in other parts of spine or neuron. Observe differences in clustering and differences in inter-cluster difference.
This entry was posted in Summaries. Bookmark the permalink.